NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Your Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation assignment is due this week no later than Sunday 11:59 PM MT. You can find the guidelines and rubric (an explanation of how you will be graded) listed below as well in the Documents section of Course Resources. This is a required Turnitin Assignment for this course.

Purpose:

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project that started with the identification of a nursing concern and PICOT/PICo question from Week 2. The focus of this nursing assignment is to discuss the research-based literature support for the selected concern, identify an appropriate research design, explain the sampling method, and discuss implementation through the use of a change model.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO 1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support the advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1)

CO 2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare. (PO 2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Five

Total Points Possible: 250 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment: This continues the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project by requiring the student to identify the additional elements of the process. The required elements are noted to be:

  • Research Literature Support (NOTE: Fifteen research-based references related to PICOT/PICo question are required)
  • Research Approach and Design
  • Sampling
  • Intervention

Criteria for Content

  1. Research Literature Support: In this section, comprehensive research literature support for the identified nursing concern and PCIOT/PICo question is to be provided. A minimum of fifteen (15)research-based references are required. The use of a systematic research review article as a reference is NOT allowed. All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. The PICOT/PICOT question is restated before presenting the research literature support. For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed:
  • -Purpose of the research study
  • -Research approach that was used
  • -Data collection methods used
  • -Results of the research study
  • -One strength of the research study
  • -One limitation of the research study.
  • 2. Research Approach and Design: In this section, the student will identify the research approach that he/she plans on using for the EBP project as being either quantitative or qualitative. In addition, if the selected approach is quantitative, the student needs to identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive. If the selected approach is qualitative, the student needs to identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, or historical. A description of the selected design is to be provided as well as the rationale for its selection. In addition, one advantage and one disadvantage to the selected design is to be identified and discussed. Required content includes:
  • -Identification of the research approach that the student plans on using as either quantitative or qualitative
  • -Identification of selected quantitative research design by indicating if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or   descriptive
  • -Identification of the selected qualitative design by indicating if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory,  or historical
  • -Description of the selected design
  • -Rationale for the selected design
  • -Identification of one advantage of the selected design
  • -Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected research approach/design
  • 3. Sampling: In this section, the student will identify the sampling method to be used in order to obtain the necessary participants for the proposed EBP project. Discussion of participants’ rights as research subjects is also included. Required content includes:
  • -Describe the target population
  • -Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability
  • -Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including:
    • Sample size
    • Inclusion criteria
    • Exclusion criteria
  • -Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected sampling method
  • 4. Proposed Implementation with a change model: In this section, the student will apply the PDSA Change Model as the method to implement the proposed EBP practice solution/change. The required content includes:
  • -Describe the PDSA Change Model
  • -Explain why this change model is best suited for the implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change
  • -Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implement the proposed practice solution/change
  • -Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project
  • -Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting
  • -Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

Preparing the NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The additional sections to the proposal are not exceeded 20 (twenty) pages. Be sure to add all new references used in these sections to the reference list. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. The title page, running head, the body of the paper, headings, and reference page(s) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
  3. The required textbook for this course, dictionary, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com, .edu, and library websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. Please contact your faculty member for guidance concerning the acceptability of a website as a scholarly source. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved the use of the older reference.
  4. This assignment is the required submission to Turn It In™ (TII) for NR 505. To prepare for the final submission, students are encouraged to use the TII draft box located in the course modules. A similarity score of 24% or less is required for the final submission. Any other level of similarity index requires the student to revise the assignment before the due date and time. To allow sufficient time for revision, early submission of the assignment to TurnItIn™ is highly encouraged. The final submission will be graded by the faculty. If the final TurnItIn™ report indicates that plagiarism has occurred, the Academic Integrity policy will be followed. Similarity scores of 25% or higher result in the implementation of the Academic Integrity Policy located in the Chamberlain College of Nursing Student Handbook.

Research Literature Support

My PICo question is: “What are nurse practitioners’ (NPS) experiences in providing care to patients who have fallen in an LTC and fractured bones in the United States?”

ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

            The first article to support the identified nursing concern is “Fall prevention program in the community: A nurse practitioner’s contribution” by B. E. Harrison. The purpose of the research study is to examine the effectiveness of two fall prevention programs in senior community settings led by nurse practitioners. The research approach used was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. Data collection methods used were the direct observation of NPS, a pretest to measure the outcome of interest prior to implementing program treatment, followed by a posttest on the same outcome of interest after subjects attended a weekly class on fall prevention. The results of the research study were obtained using paired t-test analysis and showed that fall risk scores improved P < .05. Overall, NPs who collaborate to implement fall prevention programs help reduce fall risk and improve health outcomes for patients. One strength of the research study is the direct observation of NPs in the clinical setting. One limitation of the research study was the small sample group.

The purpose of the research study for article two, “Exploring the nurse practitioner role in

managing fractures in long-term care,” by Kaasalainen et al. is to examine the level of involvement of NPs in activities related to preventing falls and managing fractures in long-term care (LTC) settings. The research approach used was a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. This involved two phases: a cross-sectional survey that was then followed by qualitative interviews. Data collection methods used were an online survey in which all 12 NPS responded and a follow-up interview in which 11 of the 12 NPS participated. Results of the research study show NPs were primarily involved in caring for residents after a new fracture occurred and that NPS used patients’ history of falls to assess the risk of future fractures.  One strength of the research study is the phases in which the data was collected. One limitation of the research study was data was collected in one demographic area and only addressed the perspective of NPs.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Your Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation assignment is due this week no later than Sunday 11:59 PM MT. You can find the guidelines and rubric (an explanation of how you will be graded) listed below as well in the Documents section of Course Resources. This is a required Turnitin Assignment for this course.

Purpose:

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project that started with the identification of a nursing concern and PICOT/PICo question from Week 2. The focus of this nursing assignment is to discuss the research-based literature support for the selected concern, identify an appropriate research design, explain the sampling method, and discuss implementation through the use of a change model.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO 1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support the advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1)

CO 2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare. (PO 2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Five

Total Points Possible: 250 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment: This continues the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project by requiring the student to identify the additional elements of the process. The required elements are noted to be:

  • Research Literature Support (NOTE: Fifteen research-based references related to PICOT/PICo question are required)
  • Research Approach and Design
  • Sampling
  • Intervention

Criteria for Content

  1. Research Literature Support: In this section, comprehensive research literature support for the identified nursing concern and PCIOT/PICo question is to be provided. A minimum of fifteen (15)research-based references are required. The use of a systematic research review article as a reference is NOT allowed. All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. The PICOT/PICOT question is restated before presenting the research literature support. For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed:
  • -Purpose of the research study
  • -Research approach that was used
  • -Data collection methods used
  • -Results of the research study
  • -One strength of the research study
  • -One limitation of the research study.
  • 2. Research Approach and Design: In this section, the student will identify the research approach that he/she plans on using for the EBP project as being either quantitative or qualitative. In addition, if the selected approach is quantitative, the student needs to identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive. If the selected approach is qualitative, the student needs to identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, or historical. A description of the selected design is to be provided as well as the rationale for its selection. In addition, one advantage and one disadvantage to the selected design is to be identified and discussed. Required content includes:
  • -Identification of the research approach that the student plans on using as either quantitative or qualitative
  • -Identification of selected quantitative research design by indicating if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or   descriptive
  • -Identification of the selected qualitative design by indicating if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory,  or historical
  • -Description of the selected design
  • -Rationale for the selected design
  • -Identification of one advantage of the selected design
  • -Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected research approach/design
  • 3. Sampling: In this section, the student will identify the sampling method to be used in order to obtain the necessary participants for the proposed EBP project. Discussion of participants’ rights as research subjects is also included. Required content includes:
  • -Describe the target population
  • -Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability
  • -Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including:
    • Sample size
    • Inclusion criteria
    • Exclusion criteria
  • -Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected sampling method
  • 4. Proposed Implementation with a change model: In this section, the student will apply the PDSA Change Model as the method to implement the proposed EBP practice solution/change. The required content includes:
  • -Describe the PDSA Change Model
  • -Explain why this change model is best suited for the implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change
  • -Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implement the proposed practice solution/change
  • -Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project
  • -Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting
  • -Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

Preparing the NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The additional sections to the proposal are not exceeded 20 (twenty) pages. Be sure to add all new references used in these sections to the reference list. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. The title page, running head, the body of the paper, headings, and reference page(s) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
  3. The required textbook for this course, dictionary, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com, .edu, and library websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. Please contact your faculty member for guidance concerning the acceptability of a website as a scholarly source. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved the use of the older reference.
  4. This assignment is the required submission to Turn It In™ (TII) for NR 505. To prepare for the final submission, students are encouraged to use the TII draft box located in the course modules. A similarity score of 24% or less is required for the final submission. Any other level of similarity index requires the student to revise the assignment before the due date and time. To allow sufficient time for revision, early submission of the assignment to TurnItIn™ is highly encouraged. The final submission will be graded by the faculty. If the final TurnItIn™ report indicates that plagiarism has occurred, the Academic Integrity policy will be followed. Similarity scores of 25% or higher result in the implementation of the Academic Integrity Policy located in the Chamberlain College of Nursing Student Handbook.

Research Literature Support

My PICo question is: “What are nurse practitioners’ (NPS) experiences in providing care to patients who have fallen in an LTC and fractured bones in the United States?”

ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

            The first article to support the identified nursing concern is “Fall prevention program in the community: A nurse practitioner’s contribution” by B. E. Harrison. The purpose of the research study is to examine the effectiveness of two fall prevention programs in senior community settings led by nurse practitioners. The research approach used was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. Data collection methods used were the direct observation of NPS, a pretest to measure the outcome of interest prior to implementing program treatment, followed by a posttest on the same outcome of interest after subjects attended a weekly class on fall prevention. The results of the research study were obtained using paired t-test analysis and showed that fall risk scores improved P < .05. Overall, NPs who collaborate to implement fall prevention programs help reduce fall risk and improve health outcomes for patients. One strength of the research study is the direct observation of NPs in the clinical setting. One limitation of the research study was the small sample group.

The purpose of the research study for article two, “Exploring the nurse practitioner role in

managing fractures in long-term care,” by Kaasalainen et al. is to examine the level of involvement of NPs in activities related to preventing falls and managing fractures in long-term care (LTC) settings. The research approach used was a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. This involved two phases: a cross-sectional survey that was then followed by qualitative interviews. Data collection methods used were an online survey in which all 12 NPS responded and a follow-up interview in which 11 of the 12 NPS participated. Results of the research study show NPs were primarily involved in caring for residents after a new fracture occurred and that NPS used patients’ history of falls to assess the risk of future fractures.  One strength of the research study is the phases in which the data was collected. One limitation of the research study was data was collected in one demographic area and only addressed the perspective of NPs.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Your Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation assignment is due this week no later than Sunday 11:59 PM MT. You can find the guidelines and rubric (an explanation of how you will be graded) listed below as well in the Documents section of Course Resources. This is a required Turnitin Assignment for this course.

Purpose:

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project that started with the identification of a nursing concern and PICOT/PICo question from Week 2. The focus of this nursing assignment is to discuss the research-based literature support for the selected concern, identify an appropriate research design, explain the sampling method, and discuss implementation through the use of a change model.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment Course Outcome:

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome:

CO 1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support the advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1)

CO 2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare. (PO 2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Five

Total Points Possible: 250 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment: This continues the development of an MSN EBP scholarly project by requiring the student to identify the additional elements of the process. The required elements are noted to be:

  • Research Literature Support (NOTE: Fifteen research-based references related to PICOT/PICo question are required)
  • Research Approach and Design
  • Sampling
  • Intervention

Criteria for Content

  1. Research Literature Support: In this section, comprehensive research literature support for the identified nursing concern and PCIOT/PICo question is to be provided. A minimum of fifteen (15)research-based references are required. The use of a systematic research review article as a reference is NOT allowed. All research studies are to be consistent with the selected concern and PICOT/PICo question. The PICOT/PICOT question is restated before presenting the research literature support. For each research-based reference the following information is to be discussed:
  • -Purpose of the research study
  • -Research approach that was used
  • -Data collection methods used
  • -Results of the research study
  • -One strength of the research study
  • -One limitation of the research study.
  • 2. Research Approach and Design: In this section, the student will identify the research approach that he/she plans on using for the EBP project as being either quantitative or qualitative. In addition, if the selected approach is quantitative, the student needs to identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or descriptive. If the selected approach is qualitative, the student needs to identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, or historical. A description of the selected design is to be provided as well as the rationale for its selection. In addition, one advantage and one disadvantage to the selected design is to be identified and discussed. Required content includes:
  • -Identification of the research approach that the student plans on using as either quantitative or qualitative
  • -Identification of selected quantitative research design by indicating if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental, or   descriptive
  • -Identification of the selected qualitative design by indicating if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory,  or historical
  • -Description of the selected design
  • -Rationale for the selected design
  • -Identification of one advantage of the selected design
  • -Identification of one disadvantage of the selected design
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected research approach/design
  • 3. Sampling: In this section, the student will identify the sampling method to be used in order to obtain the necessary participants for the proposed EBP project. Discussion of participants’ rights as research subjects is also included. Required content includes:
  • -Describe the target population
  • -Identify the sampling method as being either probability or nonprobability
  • -Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including:
    • Sample size
    • Inclusion criteria
    • Exclusion criteria
  • -Identify one advantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure
  • -Explain how participants’ rights will be protected including confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm, and informed consent
  • -Provide scholarly reference(s) to support information about the selected sampling method
  • 4. Proposed Implementation with a change model: In this section, the student will apply the PDSA Change Model as the method to implement the proposed EBP practice solution/change. The required content includes:
  • -Describe the PDSA Change Model
  • -Explain why this change model is best suited for the implementation of your evidence-based nursing practice solution/change
  • -Apply each step of the PDSA Change Model to implement the proposed practice solution/change
  • -Explain how to overcome one barrier to the use of the EBP results from this project
  • -Explain how an environment that supports EBP can be fostered in your future practice setting
  • -Include a scholarly reference(s) for the PDSA Change Model

Preparing the NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The additional sections to the proposal are not exceeded 20 (twenty) pages. Be sure to add all new references used in these sections to the reference list. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. The title page, running head, the body of the paper, headings, and reference page(s) must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
  3. The required textbook for this course, dictionary, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com, .edu, and library websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. Please contact your faculty member for guidance concerning the acceptability of a website as a scholarly source. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved the use of the older reference.
  4. This assignment is the required submission to Turn It In™ (TII) for NR 505. To prepare for the final submission, students are encouraged to use the TII draft box located in the course modules. A similarity score of 24% or less is required for the final submission. Any other level of similarity index requires the student to revise the assignment before the due date and time. To allow sufficient time for revision, early submission of the assignment to TurnItIn™ is highly encouraged. The final submission will be graded by the faculty. If the final TurnItIn™ report indicates that plagiarism has occurred, the Academic Integrity policy will be followed. Similarity scores of 25% or higher result in the implementation of the Academic Integrity Policy located in the Chamberlain College of Nursing Student Handbook.

Research Literature Support

My PICo question is: “What are nurse practitioners’ (NPS) experiences in providing care to patients who have fallen in an LTC and fractured bones in the United States?”

ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Literature, Design, Sampling, and Implementation Assignment

            The first article to support the identified nursing concern is “Fall prevention program in the community: A nurse practitioner’s contribution” by B. E. Harrison. The purpose of the research study is to examine the effectiveness of two fall prevention programs in senior community settings led by nurse practitioners. The research approach used was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design. Data collection methods used were the direct observation of NPS, a pretest to measure the outcome of interest prior to implementing program treatment, followed by a posttest on the same outcome of interest after subjects attended a weekly class on fall prevention. The results of the research study were obtained using paired t-test analysis and showed that fall risk scores improved P < .05. Overall, NPs who collaborate to implement fall prevention programs help reduce fall risk and improve health outcomes for patients. One strength of the research study is the direct observation of NPs in the clinical setting. One limitation of the research study was the small sample group.

The purpose of the research study for article two, “Exploring the nurse practitioner role in

managing fractures in long-term care,” by Kaasalainen et al. is to examine the level of involvement of NPs in activities related to preventing falls and managing fractures in long-term care (LTC) settings. The research approach used was a sequential explanatory mixed methods design. This involved two phases: a cross-sectional survey that was then followed by qualitative interviews. Data collection methods used were an online survey in which all 12 NPS responded and a follow-up interview in which 11 of the 12 NPS participated. Results of the research study show NPs were primarily involved in caring for residents after a new fracture occurred and that NPS used patients’ history of falls to assess the risk of future fractures.  One strength of the research study is the phases in which the data was collected. One limitation of the research study was data was collected in one demographic area and only addressed the perspective of NPs.

AllEscortAllEscort